Legal Intelligence & Articles Repository

Legal Insights, Supreme Court Commentaries & Statutory Law

An authoritative compendium of 80+ legal articles, landmark judgment analyses, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) guidelines, and corporate dispute strategy curated by Supreme Court and High Court advocates.

All Articles (80)Supreme Court & Constitutional LawBharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS 2023)BNSS 2023 & Criminal ProcedureArbitration & Commercial LitigationInsolvency & Bankruptcy (IBC) & Corporate RestructuringCheque Bounce & Banking LitigationProperty Law, RERA & Real EstateCorporate Law, M&A & NCLTMatrimonial & Family LawIntellectual Property Rights (IPR)Cyber Law & Data ProtectionBanking, SARFAESI & DRT RecoveryTax Litigation (GST & Income Tax)White Collar Crime, PMLA & CBI DefenseConsumer Protection & Medical Negligence
Showing results for Category: "Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)" Query: "Supreme Court" — (80 articles found)
Clear Filters
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)9 min read

Appeals, Revision & Quashing Remedies: Design Piracy under the Designs Act 2000: Novelty and Functional Shapes

Statutory infringement suits for unauthorized application of registered aesthetic designs to articles. An in-depth analysis of Section 22, Designs Act 2000 considering Bharat Glass Tube Ltd v. Gopal Glass Works Ltd (2008) 10 SCC 657. Formulated by Supreme Court & High Court advocates for legal practitioners and corporate counsels.

Adv. Ashish & Senior Partners
29 Aug 2026
Read Guide
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)8 min read

Defense Tactics & Pre-Emptive Strategies: Design Piracy under the Designs Act 2000: Novelty and Functional Shapes

Statutory infringement suits for unauthorized application of registered aesthetic designs to articles. An in-depth analysis of Section 22, Designs Act 2000 considering Bharat Glass Tube Ltd v. Gopal Glass Works Ltd (2008) 10 SCC 657. Formulated by Supreme Court & High Court advocates for legal practitioners and corporate counsels.

Adv. Ashish & Senior Partners
11 Sept 2026
Read Guide
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)7 min read

Judicial Commentary & Common Queries: Design Piracy under the Designs Act 2000: Novelty and Functional Shapes

Statutory infringement suits for unauthorized application of registered aesthetic designs to articles. An in-depth analysis of Section 22, Designs Act 2000 considering Bharat Glass Tube Ltd v. Gopal Glass Works Ltd (2008) 10 SCC 657. Formulated by Supreme Court & High Court advocates for legal practitioners and corporate counsels.

Adv. Ashish & Senior Partners
19 Aug 2026
Read Guide
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)7 min read

Recent Amendments & Future Trajectory: Design Piracy under the Designs Act 2000: Novelty and Functional Shapes

Statutory infringement suits for unauthorized application of registered aesthetic designs to articles. An in-depth analysis of Section 22, Designs Act 2000 considering Bharat Glass Tube Ltd v. Gopal Glass Works Ltd (2008) 10 SCC 657. Formulated by Supreme Court & High Court advocates for legal practitioners and corporate counsels.

Adv. Ashish & Senior Partners
28 Aug 2026
Read Guide
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)7 min read

Statutory Analysis & Procedural Guide: Intermediary Liability and Safe Harbour under Section 79 IT Act in IPR Violations

Takedown notices, actual knowledge requirement, and court-ordered blocking directives. An in-depth analysis of Section 79, Information Technology Act 2000 considering Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) 5 SCC 1; Christian Louboutin v. Nakul Bajaj (2018) DHC. Formulated by Supreme Court & High Court advocates for legal practitioners and corporate counsels.

Adv. Ashish & Senior Partners
23 Jul 2026
Read Guide
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)9 min read

Supreme Court Ratios & Case Law: Intermediary Liability and Safe Harbour under Section 79 IT Act in IPR Violations

Takedown notices, actual knowledge requirement, and court-ordered blocking directives. An in-depth analysis of Section 79, Information Technology Act 2000 considering Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) 5 SCC 1; Christian Louboutin v. Nakul Bajaj (2018) DHC. Formulated by Supreme Court & High Court advocates for legal practitioners and corporate counsels.

Adv. Ashish & Senior Partners
29 Aug 2026
Read Guide
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)6 min read

Litigation Strategy & Trial Tactics: Intermediary Liability and Safe Harbour under Section 79 IT Act in IPR Violations

Takedown notices, actual knowledge requirement, and court-ordered blocking directives. An in-depth analysis of Section 79, Information Technology Act 2000 considering Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) 5 SCC 1; Christian Louboutin v. Nakul Bajaj (2018) DHC. Formulated by Supreme Court & High Court advocates for legal practitioners and corporate counsels.

Adv. Ashish & Senior Partners
6 Aug 2026
Read Guide
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)9 min read

Procedural Roadmap & Filing Checklist: Intermediary Liability and Safe Harbour under Section 79 IT Act in IPR Violations

Takedown notices, actual knowledge requirement, and court-ordered blocking directives. An in-depth analysis of Section 79, Information Technology Act 2000 considering Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) 5 SCC 1; Christian Louboutin v. Nakul Bajaj (2018) DHC. Formulated by Supreme Court & High Court advocates for legal practitioners and corporate counsels.

Adv. Ashish & Senior Partners
30 Aug 2026
Read Guide
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)9 min read

Appeals, Revision & Quashing Remedies: Intermediary Liability and Safe Harbour under Section 79 IT Act in IPR Violations

Takedown notices, actual knowledge requirement, and court-ordered blocking directives. An in-depth analysis of Section 79, Information Technology Act 2000 considering Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) 5 SCC 1; Christian Louboutin v. Nakul Bajaj (2018) DHC. Formulated by Supreme Court & High Court advocates for legal practitioners and corporate counsels.

Adv. Ashish & Senior Partners
5 Aug 2026
Read Guide
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)6 min read

Defense Tactics & Pre-Emptive Strategies: Intermediary Liability and Safe Harbour under Section 79 IT Act in IPR Violations

Takedown notices, actual knowledge requirement, and court-ordered blocking directives. An in-depth analysis of Section 79, Information Technology Act 2000 considering Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) 5 SCC 1; Christian Louboutin v. Nakul Bajaj (2018) DHC. Formulated by Supreme Court & High Court advocates for legal practitioners and corporate counsels.

Adv. Ashish & Senior Partners
20 Jul 2026
Read Guide
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)6 min read

Judicial Commentary & Common Queries: Intermediary Liability and Safe Harbour under Section 79 IT Act in IPR Violations

Takedown notices, actual knowledge requirement, and court-ordered blocking directives. An in-depth analysis of Section 79, Information Technology Act 2000 considering Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) 5 SCC 1; Christian Louboutin v. Nakul Bajaj (2018) DHC. Formulated by Supreme Court & High Court advocates for legal practitioners and corporate counsels.

Adv. Ashish & Senior Partners
25 Aug 2026
Read Guide
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)7 min read

Recent Amendments & Future Trajectory: Intermediary Liability and Safe Harbour under Section 79 IT Act in IPR Violations

Takedown notices, actual knowledge requirement, and court-ordered blocking directives. An in-depth analysis of Section 79, Information Technology Act 2000 considering Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) 5 SCC 1; Christian Louboutin v. Nakul Bajaj (2018) DHC. Formulated by Supreme Court & High Court advocates for legal practitioners and corporate counsels.

Adv. Ashish & Senior Partners
3 Aug 2026
Read Guide
PreviousPage 6 of 7Next